Suggestion: If you find the article long, please study portions of it at a time. I have tried to present a snapshot of the prominent excuses in one place and hence could not convince myself to break this into parts.
The march
of time relentlessly brings upon changes. Some changes are good, whilst others
are not so. The everchanging time has altered the wholesomeness behind the Hindu
thought. Often quoted for its charitable and venerable idea “Lokah Samastah Sukhino Bhavantu”, today
even many Hindus wrongly disparage Hinduism as an oppressive idea, as we
believe more in subaltern studies by motivated scholars than the Rishis. Rajiv
Malhotra calls it a colonized mindset.
The
picture of Hinduism in each person’s mind is as diverse as the people
themselves. We explored the different faces of the modern Hindu.
But now we will analyze how the different Hindus hide behind excuses
when it comes to taking personal responsibility. Thus analyzing we may perhaps
be able to arrive at some solutions to counter this grim prognosis. They will
be in no particular order and this is definitely not as exhaustive as the list
appears. I hope this should trigger a conversation and serious debate within
the Hindu community and more importantly within every reader as to how we can
overcome excusitis and be more dharmabadha
– bound by dharma.
Most
Hindus are neither aware of the basic ideas or scriptures that support such a
stance. There seems to be a sense of pride for such an ignorance claiming that
Hinduism does not demand any specific understanding. But this ignorance is at
the epicenter of the knowledge erosion, digestion, loss of ecosystem,
conversion and in short loss of the values Sanatana Dharma represents.
It
appears most of our lack of interest in understanding stems from our ignorance
and tamas, though we decorate it with
a plethora of reasoning. The solution to overcome it is also very simple, take personal responsibility. We will
take time to study each of the excuses. These and other excuses are given why
we Hindus are the way we are and why we have a lackadaisical, apathetic attitude
that is the epitome of hypocrisy when we see our behavior from our scriptures
point of view.
Ignorance / Lack of
Knowledge: Do we even have a responsibility towards Sanatana Dharma? Isn’t
Hinduism just a way of life? Will the same person not agree even Hitler and the
street mongrel also have a way of life? Are there not enough Gurus doing their
job and what can a simple person who has no shastra jnana like me do? The best
is to leave it to the great pundits, sages and saints
Besides
Hinduism is so vast, has so much variance in not just the interpretation of any
given book, but also has a huge corpus of material which will take many life
times to even catalog. Have you not heard there are more than 300 Ramayanas?
(Never mind the fact that I didn’t even crack open Valmiki Ramayana, the source
of all)
Dharmic Prescription: If I jump from a skyscraper, will the
ignorance of the laws of gravity save me? If Ratnakar, a hunter can become a
Valmiki; a royal prince Siddhartha can morph into Buddha, what is this excuse
even worth? Shouldn’t our lack of knowledge or the fact that we are ignorant be a
motivating factor. Even if we are raised on the pseudo liberal and subaltern
studies like many are, we do have many influential dynamic intellectuals who
are raising the awareness. All we need
is an open mind. Lots of free resources are available thanks to internet,
Google and the willingness of many to share.
Too technical, do
not know Sanskrit: They say even the great Rishis do not know the complete
knowledge. Plus we have so many schools of thought (darshanas). Within each
type there are too many variations like bhakti, karma, jnana etc. Within even
one system like Vedanta, we have so many flavors like Advaita, Dvaita,
Visishtadvaita. Just one book Bhagavad Gita, has so many different commentaries
and interpretations.
Also to
complicate, we have Sanskrit which not only has same word like dharma or karma with numerous meanings. Add to these the esoteric meanings
which differ so much from the literal interpretations.
Dharmic Prescription: The fact that there are concepts and
ideas that are way beyond our current intellectual capacity that existed in the
past should be enough to pique our interest. Forget the pseudo science that
gets floated by the extremes like the existence of vimanas or nuclear weapons. Shouldn’t the fact that there is a wholesome
richness in our past, especially handed through literary documentation of
scriptures be a great starting point for a hungry intellect?
If
Sheldon Pollock can overcome his western roots to learn Sanskrit, to say I
don’t know Sanskrit is a very cheap baseless excuse any Indian can give. All
Indian languages are heavily influenced by Sanskrit, if not originated from it. Even
the so called Dravidian languages have a large percentage of vocabulary and
grammar akin to it. When an IT professional can learn entirely new software for
mere survival, why not learn Sanskrit or read the scriptures with good
commentaries? How many of us are forced by the economy to change careers? This
is our dharma to protect our heritage. If we already agree it was a great rich
one, how can we be the link that breaks our legacy instead of handing it over
to posterity?
With
increasing choices like Sanskrit Bharati, the excuse falls flat. On the excuse
that it is too technical, the solution is simple. Begin where you are. Start with
small steps. Our vasana baggage will not be hindrance as we are willing to work
on our attitude. It will guide us to proper translations that appeal to our
mental makeup. I am extremely proud of my friend in Australia, who turned
himself around just by taking baby steps. From extreme agnostic or atheistic
materialistic outlook to sincerely doing Japa along with his family in few
short months is nothing short of his sincere efforts and the blessings of
Krishna he prays to.
Tamas (Laziness) /
lack of time / Too busy with daily lives: We feel very proud to give this excuse that we are too
busy. Sometimes we give it as a privilege we have earned to be lazy. Either
case it is a mere expression of Tamas. We are mostly tied up with our daily
lives, many times struggling with our existence, making our desires a reality.
It is definitely true that our hectic lives are becoming busier as easy year
passes. This is despite all the modern gadgets we have for our convenience.
Dharmic Prescription: The antidote for all these stems from taking time to
understand the value of Sanatana Dharma and how it has extremely benefited
humanity. Take time to see the solutions offered to the mess of modern life,
where we are running around like headless automatons with no sense of
direction
Once we value
the small practical things we can benefit from our past, then we can kick it up
a notch. For instance, yoga can be a good starting point. Once we understand
how it helps combat our stress, we can turn our gaze deeper. Many of my friends have started practicing
Ekadasi fasting, they not only have realized some health benefits, but it has
opened their minds to receive more wisdom from our sages. Begin where you are
and plod ahead.
Mayavada
(Everything is an illusion): Indian thought process is largely influenced by Adi
Shankara and his Advaita philosophy. Even the majority of the influential Gurus
found today have serious influences from his school of thought. This has lead
to spurious interpretations of his ideas. Add to this confusion, Buddhism, New
Age and twisted mythmaking sepoys who all pile up on this misery. The average
Hindu gets these snippets of misinterpreted misquoted ideas. Already suffering
from extreme disinterest in scriptures and laziness, Mayavada provides the
perfect escape to the masses.
This
horror reaches its climax when a large number of monks, disciples of great
ashrams start using this excuse for not discharging their responsibilities to
educate the masses on their responsibilities. When requested to rebut
characters like Sheldon Pollock, Wendy Doniger, Devdutt Pattnaik’s malevolent
words or actions, even great ashrams with legacy of past Hindu luminaries like
Swami Vivekananda or Swami Sivananda, turn to this great pretense.
Dharmic Prescription: First of all these great swamijis are making the biggest
flaw. (Read more on Why
many Gurus are wrong?) Dharmo
rakshati rakshitah, says our scriptures. If they truly even follow the
scriptures they prescribe, the solution is right there. It is our
responsibility. Secondly, the same gurus do not give up eating, nor do they
give up medication if sick. We have seen how Ramana Maharishi did not even take
anesthesia for his surgery as he was above body consciousness, as also Bhagwan
Ramakrishna who did not complain about his throat cancer. But we do not see
such a behavior from these modern swamijis. Many even have wonderful ashrams
which are involved in various activities. Are they not also Maya? Then why do
them.
To the common
man invoking this argument - There is a clear distinction between Vyavaharika
(common daily life) and Paramarthika (related to Paramathma or Brahman). For
most daily lives Newtonian physics is more than adequate, but for special
situations dealing with cosmic or subatomic scales, we need Einstenian or
modern physics. In a similar way we mix up these two levels of understanding.
Despite this
mix up, be it by the spiritually advanced or the ones following, we cannot use
this lousy excuse. Just because we understand that we are all different forms
of energy, can we stop eating and just jump into fire when hungry? Fire is also
an energy form. Or touch a live wire to recharge our body’s sagging energy?
There is a
great responsibility for every swamiji or person who has benefited from this
great legacy and civilization. Is there not a sense of gratitude just because
one has managed to go to a level where one can insulate from the oddities in
the society? Have they not come from the same origins? Is there no compassion?
Selfishness; why
should I get involved?; Ego : I am already busy with my daily existence. Who has time
to study scriptures or try following it? The pressures of modern life are
already stressful, why add to this misery.
My
parents gave me a good upbringing and I will give my kids a good one too. I
think that is the best I can do. I limit
myself to my family. Gone are the times when society used to live as one. Today
it is a dog eat dog world.
A
variance to the selfishness is Ego. Why should I follow some other pattern? I
can do whatever I want.
Dharmic Prescription: The selfish person is forgetting one massive contribution.
We are today standing on the shoulders of the giants of the past. Even if we
limit our vision to the mundane existence, we find the fabric of our lives is
intricately interwoven with others. The human mind has to step beyond the I-Me-Myself circle of limitations.
This is perhaps
the reverse of the precepts of Hinduism and the examples of great mahatmas.
Ramanujacharya made 18 trips to his Guru Thirukoshtiyur Nambi to learn the
meaning of “Om Namo Narayana” and
the explicit instruction that he cannot reveal it to anyone without scruple.
Within minutes, Ramanuja climbed the temple tower to announce to the masses
that others can access this knowledge, even if he may be punished.
A sense of
reverence is bound to happen when we look at the ephemeral existence of what we
call as life and the beauty of how dependant we are on each other, even if we
build and bury ourselves in an imaginary silo.
On the
egotistic stance, only one thing can be told. So far such individuals have made
no actual independent contributions. Did they come with their own Vedas or
Upanishads or even a mundane invention? This class of individuals will continue
to exist at all times and only they can help themselves.
Kali yuga / Waiting
for some great Mahatma to come and fix it: It is told that in Kali Yuga this is the way of the
masses. So I am following the trend.
Even
worse is the excuse, I think Kalki avatar is due. Hasn’t Krishna told in
Bhagavad Gita that HE will come to reestablish Dharma? So when HE comes things
will happen. Maybe it is high time that some great Mahatma like Swami
Vivekananda will come and fix our society. That will make it easy to follow.
Another common variation of this excuse is, even Bhagwan cannot make lasting changes, what can I the lesser mortal do?
Another common variation of this excuse is, even Bhagwan cannot make lasting changes, what can I the lesser mortal do?
Dharmic Prescription: Why will Krishna or Kalki come to our rescue? Are we even
worth rescuing, as we do not even follow the most minimal basics? Secondly even
if we sanctimoniously assume ourselves as great beings, just like Draupadi’s
vastraharana episode, she did everything in her disposal before surrendering to
Krishna’s refuge. Are we even doing a millionth of what we should be doing?
Will the same
person use the same excuse for their material pursuits or things that matter to
them the most? So they stand exposed.
Hinduism has only
outdated ideas / Caste centric / Nothing modern: Such believers brand Hinduism as
limited, casteist in outlook. They believe it is out of tune with the modern
times. Why follow ancient customs which we cannot explain? What is the point of
puja or yoga or dhyana and it is not even mandated in our scriptures?
Dharmic Prescription: This perhaps is the most puerile reductionistic excuse. To
confine Hinduism to a very narrow prism of the western indologist or a heartless
sold out sepoy and claim it to be only related to ideas like caste is very
unjust. This means the person has definitely lost their reasoning or their
intention to be open.
Many of the
fault lines in our society have been engineered and deepened by our colonial
masters. Till Lord Risley introduced a Caste Census including registering
gothra compulsorily in the late 19th century, such fault lines were
not as deep as it appears today. Today’s politicians instead of uniting the
rashtra are busy deepening these fissures and converting them as vote banks.
If one claims
to be very modern and scholarly, have the honesty to dig deeper than the façade
you are dealing, the common doctored narratives with a spin. This may challenge
the very foundation of all what you believe, but have the audacity and integrity
to question even the claims you are making.
Ask simple questions like if inter varna marriage didn’t exist,
how come genetics is telling a different story? If Varna has always been like
it is understood today, how come we get an entirely different picture while
reading scriptures? If Varna is as you claim, how come Dr APJ Kalam shares a
different story in his autobiography?
Cultural Hindu: This is very fashionable in Tamil Nadu,
where the influence of the broken British idea of Aryan-Dravidian divide is at
its nadir. The argument is to reduce Sanatana Dharma to a set of secular atheistic
ideas.
Dharmic Prescription: This again is a matter of ignorance, where people do not
understand Sanatana Dharma as an open framework, a coin termed by Shri Rajiv
Malhotra. The open architecture nature of Hinduism allows mapping of different
belief systems be it a village deity model (For the arguing ignorant, many
mantras invoke grama devata. Please ask any priest to do a simple puja and most
will involve invoking grama devata, ishta devata etc) or the highly classified
Vedantic ideas. It allows for a Brahman with a form or without. It even allows
the acceptance of the intolerant monotheistic models which claim only their
idea is correct. That is how Jews lived in India and also the Zorastrians when
they were persecuted elsewhere.
How does
culture alone exist without a foundation and framework of theology and
philosophy? This excuse is very lame as such an approach is for splitting hair.
I am spiritual, not
ritual: This is the other
extreme of the above. They are an extension of not Mayavada alone. They like to
be left to their own silos.
Dharmic Prescription: Few such individuals do exist. We have seen many mahatmas
like Ramana Maharishi who lived in seclusion out of their extreme inner
evolution. The ones aping such an approach usually fall flat as they continue
to involve with the society in all other aspects. When it comes to protecting
or defending Sanatana Dharma, they tuck their tail. Please be true to whatever
scriptures you read. It is not our responsibility to reform others, but it is
our duty to contribute our strengths to the society. We may be blessed in one
area of life and it becomes our mission to share it with others.
Too young or old /
no pedigree / no support: There are many I encounter who claim their age or lack of family
interests or absence of support around as a reason why they cannot aspire to
live a Hindu way of living. This does not mean we start going back a few
centuries and live simpler lives.
Dharmic Prescription: This excuse only reveals the lack of real interest in the
person. In today’s world we have so many resources available in our finger
tips.
Will I alone
following Hinduism make a difference: This is interesting escapism.
Dharmic Prescription: This is a very westernized way of thinking. In Abrahamism
which believes in numbers and conversion, such a practice is mass oriented. In
Hinduism it is always the individual that is at the center. Only I can make a
difference for myself. I cannot shirk my responsibility and expect all the
benefits. Also one person does make a difference. One Swami Vivekananda went to
West and shook its roots. One half naked fakir, Gandhi moved the masses against
the mighty British empire.
Every person
has the same divinity is the central message of Sanatana Dharma. So why can’t
that single individual flame begin a huge conflagration? Look within, but also
play an active role outside.
Artha and Kama I
can understand, but why we need dharma and moksha: Another classic western limitation
is viewing life only through the prism of material and emotional needs.
Dharmic Prescription: In Sanatana Dharma we have identified that there are two
other levels besides materialistic and emotional/mental needs. There are clear
responsibilities to be performed in society/relationships and also transcending
all the three. This needs more subtler and deeper study within to understand.
This Kurukshetra is
very big and scary / The values expected have very high standards: The standards expected are Satyam, Ahimsa, Brahmacharya,
compassion, love, acceptance and service to all. The list keeps growing with
every book I read or Guru I listen. Working on multiple goals of Dharma-Artha-Kama-Moksha seems daunting.
Can’t it be easy like believe my God of other religions and you are assured
heaven?
Also look
at the battlegrounds – internal and external. If the internal kurukshetra is
towering and unscalable, then the external looks infested with too many
dangerous players. Why not take the easy path of just focusing on my limited
mundane life? Why go defend Hinduism from such characters?
Dharmic Prescription: Exactly the point. To take on these external forces it is
impossible unless one achieves a higher degree of inner perfection. So while we
are constantly working on ourselves, we must fulfill our responsibilities of
protecting this ecosystem.
- Start reading some scriptures on a periodic basis. If you are inclined to Bhakti, begin with itihasas and puranas. If you are more Jnana oriented begin with Bhagavad Gita and some simpler Upanishads.
- Satsanga is very crucial for all Hindus. Depending on your vasana baggage, make a choice of association that is conducive to your spiritual growth.
- Apply whatever little that we have learnt in real life.
- Focus more on Seva - nishkamya seva.
- Share what knowledge you have gained to others. It can be your family, friends or even larger community. Only by sharing, learning goes to the next level.
- Do not lower your standards to fit an easy lifestyle.
- Do not cow down to intellectual bullies who are not grounded in dharma. If you are rooted in dharma, it will give you the strength to challenge them. If you do not defend dharma, the fall is imminent.
Om Tat Sat
In my humble opinion, the post has it's basics wrong.
ReplyDeleteIt seems as if,you are begging attention from people to pay heed to a cause which is very dear to you[or to the group you belong to] which others ought to contribute to.Since they're not generally interested, you are complaining that the excuses they give are not valid.
Let me state this.
The top down approach wherever it has been used,is fundamentally flawed.
I subscribe to a bottom up approach which is the genuine way of getting at things.
If you tell X to do(or not to do) this or that,you need to have good marketing skills to do it.
So what you are really focussing is on developing Shraddha through marketing, which to my mind is incorrect way to do it.
When Sri Krishna finished giving Geeta Gyan to Arjuna,he asks him not to go on about sharing it to people, but to enlighten only those with it who have surrendered themselves to him,who seek refuge in him.
There's a powerful point Sri Krishna makes there.
Shraddha is not developed by a Sadhak convincing somebody.
For Shraddha to develop,Shraddha to know things, one has to first feel the need of it.And this need according to me should not be created by telling people or instructing them what to do or what not to do,but by leaving example of your own life to them.
As someone rightly pointed out,'Duniya apki baaton se nahi,aapke udahran se badlegi.'
Sadly, Hinduism today has very fewer examples of Stalwarts to offer,if any at all.
That's the reason why fewer Hindus are interested in any X,Y,Z a person chant.
I don't see a Rishi around in modern times.
Maybe they're on Himalayas.
But where is the work?
We know of great monumental works by ancient Sages like Vyasa,Kapila,Sushrut et cetera.But I will probably die in vain looking for a single authentic and original work of any Hindu in the field of any of the sciences.
And therefore I don't believe one has to go on about telling people to do(or not to do) this or that,rather work on one's own path to enlightenment and if one succeeds then educating those who come to you seeing your example with Shradha to know.
All these counter to excuses given by Tamsic Hindus should be given only to those who comes to your door helping for help and not to the uninterested population.
Individuals,first should bother about themselves, do some work, then educate those who come to them with Shraddha rather then going about to cure the society.
Liberation after all is achieved by individuals,not collectives.
Interesting misunderstanding. This blog is only meant for those who are interested in working on themselves. This is not a prescription on how to fix others like you have portrayed.
DeleteYou have made a comment I dont see a Rishi. Your entire mindset, perhaps, needs a overhaul. The idea is you spot the Rishi inside you, deep within.. start chipping away the edges of our own ego and we may have a better chance to replace our Rajas and Tamas with Satva. Unless we increase Satva, even if Krishna is in front showing Vishwarupa, we will behave like Duryodhan wanting to imprison him.
The article only endeavors to categorize the excuses and a potential counter. This is neither an exhaustive list nor the only antidote. If you have read a couple of other articles on the blog, you will get the drift.
When Krishna categorized the gunas, it was not meant to be used for psychoanalyzing others, but only oneself. Same way, for a person who aims at working on themselves, these articles are tools.
I do not have the hallucination that I will market these ideas and reform the world. That is definitely very imaginative on your part and I am not going to let that flatter me.
My only suggestion is have a 180 degree shift in your POV and you will get the intent of the article.
By the way, the same Arjuna forgot Gita, was given Anu Gita again and once again forgot even that and had another diluted version given to him. I am just reminding that most of us are behaving like Arjuna, only without his intelligence and prowess. Hence these articles.
The purpose is to awaken and challenge and commence a discussion. To teach and make reforms, I am not qualified with my level of sadhana. So please get the intent correct and then it will make sense to you.
The blog aims to be providing the grains of sand like a squirrel and there are lots of active intelligent ones building bridges like vanaras. Just like the inconsequential squirrel's contribution, these articles are only fondly hoping to raise the awareness, ask questions, provide tools, collate ideas. Nothing is new, perhaps the packaging. I believe while I do this to help myself the most, it is the sincere hope and belief that some may find it beneficial. Perhaps for someone advanced like you may find it childish.
My comment was on the post, not on the blog.You can re read.
ReplyDeleteI thing the blog which explains terminologies and concepts one is unaware of is a good thing.
Also I liked the tagline of your blog.
My response was limited to the post.
Secondly, I didn't say I need a Rishi.Nor is my approach to look for the same.
It's another thing that our Scriptures prescribe to look for a living Guru.
I am pointing at the fact that it doesn't work telling people what they ought to do[Again referring to post and NOT blog.].A concept that one champions should have stalwarts,and that alone speaks of their works.
It's undeniable and sickening truth that Hinduism doesn't have a single Rishi in the modern world to speak of.
Not a single original work which has impact of the magnitude which Rishis did in past.
In that case it's a shame to be polite, to ask people what to do.
I myself don't tell anyone Oh,you are a Hindu then you ought to be doing that.
Because if I knew the path,I myself would have been the enlightened one.
I am striving to swarch for it,the truth and so are you.
Your blog will do a wonderful service if it's only about sharing experiences.
This post stretches far than sharing experiences to incorporate within it instructions and direction to uninterested people what they ought to do.
That's my only limited criticism.
Thanks.