Today is Sri Rama Navami. Let us invoke HIS
blessings to purify our mind, so we can grasp Dharma, for holding on to it we
can definitely get Self-realization. In today’s India, abusing even Rama and Krishna for getting cheap political mileage or for easing the
conversion to the imported Abrahamic ideas is more than the norm. We studied
this trend that is being infected under the garb of Secularism – a potent Hinduphobic tool.
Krishna must
be booked for eve teasing, mocks a well known strong hinduphobic politician,
Veeramani. Many Hindus register protest, but the secular educated masses
devoid of bhakti or personal study of
Bhagavatam secretly wonders, maybe
such characters maligning may know more than all the great sages of Sanatana Dharma. To set right these and
other subtle questions, we are going to dive into a synopsis of Bhagavatam episode and analyze it.
Storytime – The
stealing of the Gopi’s clothes
The tenth skandha deals with the leelas of Krishnavarata. This episode occurs when Krishna is around 6-8 years. It must be
noted that there were Gopis of all
ages from six to eighty, not only diverse in age, but also their spiritual
progress. Amongst them this episode recounts the youngest of Gopis. During the first month of Hemantha season (winter), the Kumarikas amongst the Gopis indulge in the worship of Devi Katyayani. At sunrise, they took
bathe in cold river Kalindhi, subsist
only on vrata food with the sole
prayer of having Nanda’s son, Krishna as their husband. This is a
practice that has parallels in the south,
where Andal follows similar
procedure.
This devout
prayerful worship went on every dawn for a month; the girls would march to the
river, singing songs on Krishna
loudly. One day after depositing their clothes on the bank, they continued
singing even as they sported in the river. It may be noteworthy to remember
these Kumarikas were naked in the
river. Krishna, eager to bestow the fruits of the rites, collected all the
clothes and deposited on a nearby Kadamba
tree. He spoke loudly to these maidens to come out of the river collect their
clothes. At first the girls thought it was in jest. As weeks of fasting and
cold made them shiver in the river, they started pleading. They wondered if
such a behavior was in accordance with Nanda’s
son. They praised Krishna’s beauty
even as they highlighted their pitiable situation. The girls declared they were
HIS handmaidens. As a person of propriety, they declared Krishna must return the clothes or else, they will report to his
father, who was also the village chieftain. Their repeated pleas produced no
impact.
Seeing Krishna’s resolve and smile, the girls
came out covering their private parts with their palms. The pleased Krishna smilingly reminded that
according to Dharma shastra, bathing
naked is a violation of their vow and a transgression of varuna devta. (Na Nagnah Snanam Aachareth). To atone for this, He suggests the girls place their hands in salutation on the heads
and prostrate the ground and then get their clothes. It must be constantly in
the backdrop that Krishna is the sole
provider of fruits. Once they understood
their mistake, they immediately followed his instructions and Krishna graciously returned their
clothes. Though it appears that Krishna
seems to have abused and used as toys, the Bhagavatam
further records the girls felt no resentment and were not ready to move from
the place. They stood there stealing bashful glances at Shyamasundara, their minds enthralled by HIS presence and
proximity.
The
Gopis wanted to merge with Krishna, something any deep lover would
feel, to lose the identity. In the worldly plane, this can be maximum felt for
few seconds in communion. He advises them communing with Paramatma is rising above the body-mind-intellect identity. Krishna mindful of the deep desires of
the Gopis assures their emotions will
fructify in due course of time. He addresses them as Sati, virtuous women.
In
the Rasa Lila episode, one can
clearly understand the bursting of emotions that surge through the hearts of Gopis gradually elevating them to the
highest possible human perception of Krishna.
As a prerequisite, one has to give up body consciousness, which is exactly what
we learn in this episode.
Deeper insights:
To get a
better grasp of this episode, let us pose some of the most popular wrong ideas
and abuses, so we can destroy the deep Tamas that rises even in most cultural
Hindus due to the shadows of characters like Veeramani. Before we proceed we
must define who is a cultural Hindu – This makes up the majority of the Hindu
masses, who neither have time to read scriptures or learn it by seeing wrong
portrayals on TV or social media, who have no connection or pride about the
roots nor do these people cleave themselves off the cultural practices that
binds the nation. Read more about them in the Confused Modern Hindu.
How can we be sure he
was around 6-8?
If we take Bhagavatam as the source to abuse Krishna, then isn’t it logical
that the only source for these episodes is only Bhagavatam. One must not forget
that after this episode, Krishna has many other pastimes like giving salvation
to the women who fed him, obstructing Indra
yajna followed by the lifting of the Govardhan,
his morphing as Govinda besides the Rasa Lila. So we can be fairly certain
of his rough age.
For the self
certified skeptics and with deep tamas,
earlier in third skanda, Shuka records Vasudeva bringing Krishna
to be raised in Vraja by Nanda as a covered fire for eleven years on account of Kamsa.
ततो नन्दव्रजमितः पित्रा कंसाद्विबिभ्यता एकादश समास्तत्र गूढार्चिः सबलोऽवसत्
(Bhagavatam 3-2-26)
tato nanda-vrajam itaḥ pitrā kaṁsād vibibhyatā ekādaśa samās tatra gūḍhārciḥ sa-balo 'vasat
It is not a logical leap to
understand that Krishna left Vraja at eleven and had many pastimes
after this episode, so one can comfortably arrive at the age as 6-8.
How can we be sure of
the age of the girls?
The media for titillating the masses
and also some of the medieval texts where the poets took latitude to highlight that Rasa Lila was above the physical
communion chose to portray the Gopis
as perhaps older teens. It must be firmly noted that Bhagavatam repeatedly refers them as Kumarikas. From the choice of words and other descriptions given,
it is obvious that these were pre-pubescent girls. It is obvious Ved Vyasa wanted to clearly distinguish Kanyas, who are much older and Balika, a word that refers to girl
children. One important clue is in the fact; they were all naked in the river,
ignorant of the shastras, yet displaying
their childish side. It has been with deep Hindu culture that no girl after
puberty goes out naked, be it with her friends or alone, giving firm credence
to the idea that the girls were pre pubescent. Hence the popular portrayal of
them as much older women is not only mischievous, but at the root of all
deliberate defamation and abuse.
How do we know there was no sexual
perversion like the ones who abuse?
As noted, the basis of this abuse is
deep ignorance in the minds of the public. The issue is we try to understand Paramatma with a silly human construct,
worse yet we want to impute the dirtiest vasanas
of our mind. The colored prism of our understanding coupled with the lack of
realization that Bhagawan is Pure
Consciousness only forms the basis for even entertaining such questions. The
ones who hurl choicest epithets like Veeramani are a different breed and have
different motives.
It is one
thing to claim whatever we want, is there proof from the same scripture? Answer
is a resounding yes. Krishna is
highly pleased with the worship and devotion of the Gopis and grants their deepest desire to immerse themselves into
HIS SUPREME SELF. He asks them to wait for a futuristic time.
Krishna
clearly declares that DESRIE (Kama)
directed towards HIM with the intention of being absorbed in HIM does not
result in sensual enjoyment. Just as a boiled grain loses its germinating
capacity, association with Krishna
destroys all sensuous nature of Kama.
न मय्यावेशितधियां कामः कामाय कल्पते
भर्जिता क्वथिता धानाः प्रायो बीजाय नेशते
(Bhagavatam 10-22)
na mayy āveśita-dhiyāṁ kāmaḥ kāmāya kalpate bharjitā kvathitā dhānāḥ
prāyo bījāya neśate
Why is Krishna exploiting these innocent girls,
is this not a classic case of eve teasing?
Even ahead
of the Sri Krishna’s entry into the
scene, it is very evident what the Kumarikas
were after and the intention of HIS coming is declared even at the outset as to
fulfill their desires and prayers. The girls were intent on having Krishna as their husband. Though the
prayer is to Katyayani, Krishna declares in Bhagavad Gita that HE is the sole dispenser of the fruits of
actions. He repeatedly declares HE is the dhaata,
the dispenser. So in order to fulfill the Gopis
sincere prayers, when HE HIMSELF is nearby, what special form HE needs to take.
Also HE is the fruit the Gopis want,
which only HE can provide. It makes logical sense.
One must
note that after Krishna returned the
clothes, they were comfortable not only wearing them in his presence, but will
not budge from the place. One of the highest forms of Bhakti, declared in the Shastras
is Nayaka-nayika bhava. The Supreme
is envisioned as Purusha, this is not
the proverbial male in the human sense. This was the attitude of Andal, a great Tamil Vaishnavite saint, Mira Bai of the Rajputs and even many
Saivite saints like Ramalinga Swami (Vallalar)
of Tamil Nadu. To reduce this to mere sex and flesh level is not mere blasphemy
but the perversion of the mind at its worst.
Krishna’s approval of their prayers and
a promise to give them a special experience at an appropriate time was the only
thing that makes the Gopis return
home reluctantly, yet with their hearts brimming with love and emotions for Krishna. The Bhagavatam doesn’t record one instance of any Gopi ever complaining against Krishna.
It records numerous instances of complaints about HIS stealing of butter, but not of the hearts.
Is there a deeper
significance of this episode?
From Dharma shastra level, Krishna is eager to correct the mistake
of HIS devotees, so that they can progress in the spiritual journey and attain
HIM. He goes over and beyond to ensure they are taken care. We see innumerable
instances in the Mahabharata, where
HE bends so many practices, established dogmas to protect the Pandavas, especially Arjuna. Here HE merely makes sure the Gopis follow the established Principles.
We already
noted though the worship is carried out to the Devi form, HE being the fruit of their prayer and also the fact HE
alone is the sole dispenser of the fruits, Krishna
merely takes advantage of their prayer preparation time.
From a Vedantic point of view, the body, the panchakoshas need to be relinquished for
any spiritual aspirant to realize. It is well established in the science of Vedanta. To transcend the body, it takes
a lot of Sadhana. To immerse
completely with Paramatma, one must
get rid of the name-form complex (nama
rupa). For the highly evolved spiritual aspirants in Gopis, the spiritual master, yogeshwara,
wants to aid in their journey by forcing them to be cognizant of this crucial milestone.
Infact, HE holds their hands to cross this threshold.
So whether
we take it from an esoteric Vedantic or
the deep bhakti views, one can only
melt at the compassion of Krishna and
HIS eagerness to raise each one of us. That is why HE aptly earned the epithet,
Bhaktavatsala, the lover of HIS
devotees.
What can we do against
characters like Veermani?
This purely
depends on the individual capacity and to the level we grasp Dharma. But there is something we all
can do. Get correct knowledge directly from the sources. Spend sometime
erecting a fortress around yourself. Strengthen it with Sadhana and Shastras.
Practice Kshatriyata to the extent
our spiritual foundation supports. The worst we can do is being apathetic and
indifferent or talk false Vedanta telling
let us ignore such characters. Even Ravana
or Hiranyakashipu or Duryodhana refused to accept even when Paramatma HIMSELF appeared to impart
wisdom. This only implies if we do not raise ourselves be in as Bhakta, Jnani or even in Karma Yoga,
we do not deserve to be rescued. Lies thrive only when there is no TRUTH, just
like absence of light is darkness. It is upto us to dispel this darkness we
have cast upon ourselves.
Can we use
the abundance of negative thinking all around us as an inflection point, one to
ponder that we all have a huge role to play in the society, which we can never
effectively do if we do not start from within.
May on this
auspicious day of Rama Navami, we
fervently make a sankalpa to not only
seek the TRUTH within, but also in our scriptures. Let us stop making the media
and other perverted platforms as the source of our shastras. Let us take every effort to slowly, yet surely take some
time off the busy lives, chasing ephemeral trinkets and spend few minutes at the
lotus feet of Rama. It may be Krishna or Shiva or Devi. Still let
us not forget that the divinity expressing in the different roles is the same.
Om Tat Sat